Evidence Hub

(026) penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy using LOW-intensity shockwave therapy for erectile function: late results findings from a randomized clinical trial

P. Lessa, L. Lopes, M. Salles, R. Cordeiro, C. Pazeto, W. Baccaglini, S. Glina

Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2024

77 participants

Abstract

There is still few evidence to support the use of low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (LiESWT) in the management of erectile dysfunction (ED) after radical prostatectomy (RP).

The aim of this study is to assess the long-term results of LiWEST as a penile rehabilitation method in patients who underwent RP.

This is an assessment of the late results outcomes of our previous clinical trial registered in ReBEC (ensaiosclinicos.gov.br) RBR-85HGCG. Patients were randomized in two groups with 2 parallel arms and an allocation ratio of 1:1. The control group received tadalafil 5 mg/day, while the experimental group were submitted to tadalafil 5 mg/day plus 2400 shocks/session-week distributed on 4 different penile regions across 8 weeks of treatment. Both groups started the penile rehabilitation after the removal of the transurethral catheter. Sexual function was assessed by IIEF-5 score.

Among 77 patients included in our previous analysis, 35 patients were reassessed after a median follow-up of 45 months (42-50 months; CI 95%). 17 of them had to be excluded from the analysis for biochemical recurrence and/or new interventions. Remaining 7 and 11 patients in the experimental and control group, respectively. The final mean IIEF-5 score between experimental and control groups showed a difference in favor of the LiWEST group, not statistics significantly (18.85, SD 5.66, 95% CI 13.61-24.1 x 16.63, SD 5.48, 95%CI 12.9-20.31; respectively; p = 0.42). Subgroup analysis in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 77 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free