Evidence Hub

Efficacy of Silodosin and Tadalafil monotherapy versus combination of both drugs as MET for distal ureteric stones: A prospective, double blinded, randomized clinical trial

T. Diab, Abdallah Fathi, A. El-Dakhakhny, A. Abou Elezz

Arab Journal of Urology, 2024

128 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective To assess efficacy and safety of silodosin, tadalafil, versus combination of both medications as medical expulsive therapy (MET) for distal ureteric stones. Methods This prospective, double blinded, randomized clinical trial included 128 patients aged 18 years or more irrespective of gender who are presented to emergency department or outpatient with distal ureteric stones ranging in size from 5–10 mm, randomized into three groups: Group I (n = 42) received Silodosin 8 mg once daily, Group II (n = 44) received Tadalafil 5 mg once daily, and Group III (n = 42) received Silodosin 8 mg combined with Tadalafil 5 mg one daily. All participants underwent thorough history-taking, routine laboratory investigations, and clinical examinations. The primary end point included expulsion rate and time and treatment tolerance. Secondary end points were number pain episodes, need for emergency room visit, amount of analgesia, need for intervention. Results The expulsion rate was 71.4% for silodosin, 61.4% for tadalafil and 88.1% for combined therapy (p = 0.018). Expulsion time was significantly shorter after combined therapy 10.4 + 3.5 days, while after silodosin 14.1 + 4 days, while 17.8 + 3.4 days after tadalafil (p < 0.001). The number of pain episodes, emergency room visits, and the amount of analgesia were significantly in favour of combined therapy (p value 0.004, 0.010, and <0.001) respectively. Conclusions A combination of Silodosin with Tadalafil as a MET for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 128 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free