Evidence Hub

Choroidal and retinal alteration after long-term use of tadalafil: a prospective non-randomized clinical trial

Luca D’Andrea, G. Califano, Marco Abate, M. Capece, C. Ruvolo, F. Crocetto, M. Passaro, G. Cennamo et al.

Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology, 2024

22 participants

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The purpose of this study is to investigate choroidal and retinal vascular features in patients taking PDE5is by measuring dynamic vascular alterations and neurostructural features of the retina before and after oral tadalafil administration. Methods The current clinical research involved 22 patients treated with tadalafil 20 mg on alternate days (OAD) after nerve-sparing robotic radical prostatectomy (NS-RARP) for prostate cancer. Patients underwent SD-OCT to assess ganglion cell complex (GCC), retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), as well as OCTA to assess superficial capillary plexus (SCP), deep capillary plexus (DCP), choriocapillaris (CC), foveal avascular zone (FAZ), and radial peripapillary capillary thickness (RPC). All patients were evaluated at baseline (t0), and 3 (t1) and 6 (t2) months after the use of oral tadalafil. Results A statistically significant reduction in DCP and CC vessel density was found at t2 compared to baseline. According to the SFCT parameter, a statistically significant increase was observed from t0 to t1, and from t1 to t2. GCC parameter increased at t2 compared to baseline in a statistically significant way. No statistically significant differences were recorded between t0, t1 and t2 for the SCP, RPC, FAZ area, RNFL parameter. Conclusions Retinal and optic disc toxicity may be detected using modifications of capillary vessel density. Further studies are needed to detect the possible…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 22 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free