Evidence Hub

Prognostic Value and Determinants of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T in Patients With a Systemic Right Ventricle: Insights From the SERVE Trial

F. J. Ruperti-Repilado, F. Tran, P. Haaf, P. López-Ayala, Matthias Greutmann, M. Schwerzmann, J. Bouchardy, Harald Gabriel et al.

Journal of the American Heart Association : Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, 2024

3 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The determinants and prognostic value of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) among patients with a systemic right ventricle are largely unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients from the randomized controlled SERVE (Effect of Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibition With Tadalafil on Systemic Right Ventricular Size and Function) trial were included. The correlation between baseline hs-cTnT concentrations and biventricular volumes and function quantified by cardiac magnetic resonance or cardiac multirow detector computed tomography was assessed by adjusted linear regression models. The prognostic value of hs-cTnT was assessed by adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, survival analysis, and concordance statistics. The primary outcome was time to the composite of clinically relevant arrhythmia, hospitalization for heart failure, or all-cause death. Median age was 39 (interquartile range, 32-48) years, and 32% were women. Median hs-cTnT concentration was 7 (interquartile range, 4-11) ng/L. Coefficients of determination for the relationship between hs-cTnT concentrations and right ventricular end-systolic volume index and right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) were +0.368 (P=0.046) and -0.381 (P=0.018), respectively. The sex- and age-adjusted hazard ratio for the primary outcome of hs-cTnT at 2 and 4 times the reference level (5 ng/L) were 2.89 (95% CI, 1.14-7.29) and 4.42 (95% CI, 1.21-16.15), respectively. The prognostic performance quantified by…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free