Evidence Hub

Dexketoprofen vs. Tamsulosin vs. Silodosin vs. Tadalafil as Medical Expulsive Therapy for Distal Ureteral Stones in Men

M. Gur, M. Ulu, Süleyman Çalışkan, K. Ozturk, E. Akdeniz

Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP, 2021

193 participants · 12 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of the use of dexketoprofen, tamsulosin, silodosin, and tadalafil in medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones in male patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study.

PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY

Department of Urology, Gazi Hospital, Samsun, Turkey, from March 2020 to March 2021.

METHODOLOGY

Adult males satisfying the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned into dexketoprofen (Group 1), tamsulosin (Group 2), silodosin (Group 3), or tadalafil (Group 4) treatment arms. The primary endpoint consisted of the stone expulsion rate at the end of four weeks, while the secondary endpoints were the expulsion rate after two weeks and the occurrence of adverse events. Clinical findings were then compared among the study groups.

RESULTS

Altogether 193 patients, 50 (25.9%) in group 1, 48 (24.9%) in group 2, 49 (25.4%) in group 3, and 46 (23.8%) in group 4, were enrolled in the study. No significant difference was determined in terms of age, body mass index, stone characteristics, expulsion time, pain episodes, or total analgesic consumption among the four groups. Expulsion rates in the fourth week were 48%, 79.2%, 81.6%, and 78.3% in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Stone expulsion rates were significantly greater in groups 2, 3, and 4 compared to group 1 (p <0.001), but no significant differences were determined between groups 2, 3, and 4. No severe adverse effects occurred throughout the study period.

CONCLUSION

Tamsulosin, silodosin and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 193 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free