Evidence Hub

Association of Medication Use and 8-Year Mortality Risk in Patients With Parkinson Disease: Drug-Wide Trial Emulation

Julia A. Tuominen, T. Riise, J. Romanowska, Mario H. Flores-Torres, Marianna Cortese, C. Scherzer, K. Bjørnevik, J. Igland

Neurology, 2025

14,289 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are currently no treatments that can halt or slow the progression of Parkinson disease (PD). The aim of this study was to identify new drug repurposing candidates for PD among existing prescription drugs that could be used to modify the disease course.

METHODS: This nationwide observational cohort study (2004-2020) used Norwegian health registries and was conducted as a high-throughput drug screen using an emulated target trial design. All individuals who met our prescription-based classification criteria for PD, were older than 25 years at the time of diagnosis, and were not prescribed the target drug in the past 2 years were included. We emulated a target trial for any drug filled by a minimum of 100 individuals at any pharmacy in Norway, which amounted to a total of 219 drugs. Mortality was used as an outcome to indicate disease progression. We estimated the effect of drug initiation, an observational analog of the intention-to-treat effect, on the 8-year risk of death, comparing initiators of the target drug with initiators of drugs within the same Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system level 1 group. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for potential confounders.

RESULTS: The study included 14,289 individuals with PD (mean age 72 at diagnosis, 59% male) and identified 23 drugs associated with reduced mortality risk at 8 years. These drugs included ranitidine (histamine-2 blocker); pantoprazole and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 14,289 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free