Evidence Hub

Efficacy of Doxycycline as monotherapy or in combination with Levofloxacin in treating late-stage systemic anthrax in non-human primates

A. Ben-Shmuel, Assa Sittner, I. Glinert, Elad Bar-David, Josef Schlomovitz, Haim Levy, Shay Weiss

bioRxiv, 2026

Abstract

Background: Bacillus anthracis spores pose a major biosecurity threat, in light of their use in several documented bioterror attacks and the fact that it was weaponized. The absence of specific and accurate treatment instructions in the 2001 anthrax letter attacks and the poor prognosis of patients receiving ineffective treatment emphasized the need for reliable guidelines for treating exposed (prophylaxis) or symptomatic populations. The recent 2023 CDC guidelines for treating systemic anthrax recommend a combined treatment of a tetracycline (minocycline or doxycycline) with meropenem or a fluoroquinolone. These recommendations differ from the 2001 and 2015 updates, and in the absence of significant clinical data, rely on animal studies. Previously, we demonstrated, based on a rabbit model, that these recommendations are effective in treating various stages of anthrax, ranging from post-exposure prophylaxis to systemic involvement and involvement of the CNS. Methods: We used a trigger-to-treat type of experiment using non-human primates (NHP) infected by nasal spray of a lethal dose of B. anthracis spores. Results: We confirmed our rabbit results by demonstrating the efficacy of doxycycline as a monotherapy or in combination with levofloxacin in treating late-stage systemic anthrax in non-human primates (NHP), in a trigger-to-treat type of experiment. Our experiments show high efficacy of the mono or combined therapy. Conclusions: Our results support the CDC guidelines…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free