Evidence Hub

An atypical erectile dysfunction patient with infertility treated with penile prosthesis implantation and testicular epididymal sperm aspiration (TESA)-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI): A case report

Mengyuan Lin, Honghua Wang, Yan Wang, Shi-Wen Jiang

Medicine, 2023

Abstract

Rationale: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is common in middle-aged and elderly men, affecting more than 100 million males worldwide. Most ED cases can be attributed to organic and/or psychological factors. Here we report an atypical ED case with no clear manifestation fitting the diagnosis for recognized types of ED. Patient concerns: The 35-year-old male is unable to have normal erection since puberty, and unable to complete intercourse with his wife. He had no history of trauma, surgery or psychiatric/psychological disease. The patient has a normal male karyotype. There is no significant finding in physical examination, nocturnal penile tumescence test, and ultrasound measurement of penis vascular functions. The serum levels of major hormones are all in normal ranges. Diagnoses: Atypical ED, psychogenic ED not excluded; infertility. Interventions: Oral phosphodiesterase inhibitors Tadalafil (20 mg, BIW) or Sildenafil (50 mg, BIW) had no effect in this patient. Penile prosthesis implantation helped the patient to acquire normal sexual life, but did solve the ejaculation failure and infertility. Motile sperms were obtained by testicular epididymal sperm aspiration under the guidance of ultrasound, and intracytoplasmic sperm injection was performed with occytes retrieved from his wife. Outcomes: The patient sexual life was significantly improved after penile prosthesis implantation; the patient wife is currently in the first trimester of pregnancy as the result of in vitro…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free