Evidence Hub

MP53-13 efficacy of tadalafil for treating chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome in patients without erectile dysfunction

H. Park, Sung Woo Park, N. Park

Journal of Urology, 2019

46 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: PDE5 inhibitors increase blood flow to the pelvic organs and improve lower urinary tract symptoms, so it is postulated that PDE5 inhibitors could be effective on treating chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). In this background, we investigated the efficacy of tadalafil for the treatment of CP/CPPS in patients without erectile dysfunction (ED). METHODS: Eighty-six males with a National Institutes of Health (NIH) diagnosis of category III CP/CPPS, but who did not have ED, were randomized in single-blinded fashion to receive either levofloxacin (500 mg/day; group 1; 40 patients) or levofloxacin (500 mg/day) and tadalafil (5 mg/day; group 2; 46 patients) for 6 weeks. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), NIH chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI), and erectile function (EF) domain scores of the International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF) questionnaire were used to grade symptoms at baseline and 6 weeks later. RESULTS: The mean ages of the two groups were 49.2±6.7 and 48.3±7.1 years, respectively. There were no significant differences between the groups in age, duration of the condition, IPSSs, NIH-CPSI scores, or IIEF-EF domain scores at baseline. Tadalafil significantly improved the mean change in the IPPS from baseline to 6 weeks (group 1; -1.1 vs. group 2; -4.2, p<0.05). Significant improvements were also evident in the IPSS voiding subscore (group 1; -0.7 vs. group 2; -3.1, p<0.05). Larger changes…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 46 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free