Evidence Hub

Early Effects of Oral Pulmonary Vasodilators in an Elderly Patient with Critical Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: A Case Report

Hirotake Okazaki, N. Hata, A. Shirakabe, Masafumi Tsurumi, T. Shinada, W. Shimizu

Journal of Nippon Medical School = Nippon Ika Daigaku zasshi, 2015

Abstract

A 70-year-old woman who had been treated for bipolar disorder and dementia was admitted to the intensive care unit of a university hospital with severe dyspnea; pulmonary arterial hypertension was diagnosed after cardiac catheterization was performed. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography showed typical signs of chronic thrombosis in the proximal pulmonary artery without an adequate amount of fresh thrombi, which appeared to be the cause of the elevation in pulmonary artery pressure, and resulted in severe hypoxemia. Therefore, the pulmonary arterial hypertension was classified as belonging to the chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension subgroup. Although the patient's respiratory condition was classified as World Health Organization class IV, she was treated with the combination of oral ambrisentan and tadalafil, rather than intravenous epoprostenol, which she was unable to tolerate. Consequently, both her symptom and hemodynamic status showed rapid improvement with only oral pulmonary vasodilators. This case demonstrates the efficacy of oral treatment alone in elderly patients with severe chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free