Evidence Hub

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 26-Week Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ertugliflozin in Asian Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin Monotherapy (VERTIS-ASIA)

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2017

506 participants

Abstract

This is a study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the addition of ertugliflozin to metformin monotherapy in Asian participants with Type 2 diabetes mellitis (T2DM) who have inadequate glycemic control on metformin monotherapy. The primary hypothesis is that the mean reduction from baseline in HbA1C for 15 mg and 5 mg ertugliflozin (tested sequentially) is greater than for placebo.

Conditions: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Primary outcome: Change From Baseline in A1C (%) at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach); Change From Baseline in A1C (%) at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation); Percentage of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE) (Including Rescue Approach); Percentage of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE) (Including Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation); Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE (Including Rescue Approach); Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE (Including Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation).

Enrollment: 506 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 506 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free