Evidence Hub

Efficacy of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis during induction phase in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Landivar MC, Hartmann Rost I, Carvalho Kilson A, Torres Campo MA, Santarosa Vieira AG

European journal of pediatrics, 2026

991 participants

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The role of infection prevention with fluoroquinolone prophylaxis specifically, during induction chemotherapy in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess its efficacy. PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials and observational studies. The main outcome was febrile neutropenia (FN) 26 and secondary outcomes were bloodstream infection (BSI), Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and all-cause mortality (ACM). A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted. We included 7 studies with 991 patients; 439 (44.3%) used fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, of whom 255 used levofloxacin and 184 used ciprofloxacin. The B-cell immunophenotype was the most frequent. Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis reduced the risk of FN (46.1% vs 64.9%; OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.33-0.59; I2 = 0%). Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis also significantly reduced the risk of BSI (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.32-0.81; I2 = 0%). Risks of CDI (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.00-42.30; I2 = 39.6%) and ACM (OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.20-5.38; I2 = 54.3%) were not significantly altered.

CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis during induction chemotherapy for pediatric ALL significantly reduces FN and BSI without increasing C. difficile risk. While overall mortality is unchanged, reducing infectious morbidity may enhance treatment tolerance.

WHAT IS KNOWN: • Febrile neutropenia and bloodstream infections are…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 991 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free