Evidence Hub

Prepregnancy Polycystic Ovary Syndrome as a Risk Factor of Subsequent Preterm Labor: A National Population-Based Cohort Study

Pan ML, Chen LR, Chen KH

International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022

7,836 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Background: Preterm labor and the following preterm births, which account for most of the perinatal deaths, are an important issue in public health. The study aims to assess the risk of subsequent preterm labor in pregnant females who have prepregnancy polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Methods: This study has enrolled 1,000,000 randomly sampled females retrieved from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) during 1998−2012. The study excluded prepregnancy PCOS females who were initially diagnosed at age 45, and those who had inconsistent diagnoses. Moreover, the medical records of blood hormone tests, gynecologic ultrasonography, pelvic examinations, and tocometers were verified to confirm the accuracy of both diagnoses of PCOS and preterm labor. Among the prepregnancy PCOS females who became pregnant (the case group), each was age-matched to four females without prepregnancy PCOS (the control group). Results: Pregnant females in the case group (n = 1959) had a higher incidence of preterm labor than those in the control group (n = 7836) (42.98% vs. 21.99%, p < 0.0001). Analyzed by using logistic regression, the risk of preterm labor was significantly higher in the case group compared with the control group (crude OR: 2.674; 95% CI: 2.410−2.968, p < 0.0001). After adjustment with covariates, further analysis revealed a similar trend (adjusted OR: 2.405; 95% CI: 2.158−2.680, p < 0.0001). Among 1959 PCOS females in the case group, 196 had undergone…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 7,836 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free