Evidence Hub

Risk of Thyroid Tumors With GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Daniel R. Morales, F. Bu, Benjamin Viernes, Scott L. DuVall, M. Matheny, Katherine R. Simon, T. Falconer, Lauren R. Richter et al.

Diabetes Care, 2025

20 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To assess the association between glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) use and risk of incident thyroid tumors. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The retrospective, active-comparator new-user cohort study used international administrative claims and electronic health record databases. Participants included patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with prior metformin therapy initiating a GLP-1RA versus new users of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4is), and sulfonylureas (SUs). The outcome was incident thyroid tumor and thyroid malignancy. Propensity score matching and stratification were used to adjust for confounders with an intention-to-treat and on-treatment strategy. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. Unmeasured confounding was evaluated using negative outcomes, with calibration of the HR. RESULTS A total of 460,032 users of GLP-1RAs, 717,792 users of SGLT2is, 2,055,583 users of DPP-4is, and 1,119,868 users of SUs were included. Only U.S. cohorts passed study diagnostics. Thyroid tumor incidence ranged from 0.88 to 1.03 per 1,000 person-years in GLP-1RA cohorts. GLP-1RA exposure was not associated with an increased risk of thyroid tumors compared with SGLT2is, DPP-4is, or SUs (meta-analysis: GLP-1RA vs. SGLT2i HR range from 0.83 [95% CI 0.57–1.27] to 0.95 [0.85–1.06]; GLP-1RA vs. SU HR range from 0.95 [0.75–1.20] to 1.03…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free