Evidence Hub

Individual and Combined Associations of Glucose Metabolic Components With Cognitive Function Modified by Obesity

He R, Zheng R, Li J, Cao Q, Hou T, Zhao Z, Xu M, Chen Y et al.

Frontiers in endocrinology, 2021

2,925 participants

Abstract

AIM: We aimed to detect the individual and combined effect of glucose metabolic components on cognitive function in particular domains among older adults.

METHODS: Data of 2,925 adults aged over 60 years from the 2011 to 2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were analyzed. Individuals' cognitive function was evaluated using the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), the Animal Fluency Test (AF), the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Immediate Recall (CERAD-IR), and CERAD Delayed Recall (CERAD-DR). Participants' glucose metabolic health status was determined based on fasting plasma glucose, insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and 2-h postload glucose. Linear regression models were used to delineate the associations of cognitive function with individual glucose metabolic component and with metformin use. Logistic regression models were performed to evaluate the associations of cognition with the number of glucose metabolic risk components.

RESULTS: CERAD-IR was significantly associated with HOMA-IR and insulin. HbA1c was related to all the cognitive tests except AF. Among participants without obesity, HOMA-IR and insulin were both negatively associated with CERAD-IR and CERAD-DR. Odds of scoring low in DSST increased with the number of glucose metabolic risk components (odds ratio 1.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26 to 2.98). Metformin use was associated with better…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 2,925 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free