Evidence Hub

Partial non-adherence to antidiabetic therapy undermines diabetes management and correlates with treatment complexity: A cross-sectional study using blood plasma analysis

Škop V, Laňková I, Antalová S, Míšková I, Malá-Ládová K, Malý J, Pelikánová T, Hricko J et al.

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate medication adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) using plasma drug measurements and assess the clinical impact of partial non-adherence on glycemic control and complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 641 T2D outpatients attending routine follow-up visits. After overnight fasting, blood samples were collected and analysed by LC-MS to quantify plasma concentrations of 13 oral antidiabetic drugs. Adherence was defined as the detection of a prescribed drug above the limit of quantification. Self-reported lifestyle factors, dosing regimens, and clinical outcomes were assessed in relation to drug presence.

RESULTS: Metformin adherence was very high, with the drug undetected in only 1.9% of patients. In contrast, adherence rates were lower for sulfonylureas (94%), DPP-4 inhibitors (90%), pioglitazone (82%), and SGLT2 inhibitors (73%). Non-adherence was predominantly partial: only one of the analysed antidiabetics taken by patients was not detected in 93% of non-adherent patients. Adherence declined with increasing numbers of prescribed agents and daily doses, suggesting treatment complexity as a key factor. No other tested lifestyle or drug management parameters were significantly associated with adherence. Glycemic control was worse in non-adherent patients: 63% did not reach target glucose and HbA1c levels, compared to 37% of fully adherent patients. Non-adherence was also associated with a higher prevalence of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free