Evidence Hub

Dosing Strategies for High-Alert Medications in Obese Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review

Hernández-Gago Y, Minagorre PJA, Sánchez-Hernández JG, Marrodán BR, Hernández Sabater L, Negrín ACR, Rodríguez-Suárez CA, Research Group on High-Alert Medication Dosing in Obese Pediatric Patients, Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH) and The Spanish Society of Hospital Pediatric Internal Medicine (SEPIH)

Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2026

Abstract

Background/Objective: Childhood obesity induces physiological changes that alter drug distribution and clearance; however, these patients are often excluded from clinical trials, creating a critical safety gap for high-alert medications (HAM). The Objective was to evaluate HAM dosing strategies and pharmacokinetic (PK) alterations in overweight and obese pediatric patients. Methods: A systematic review was conducted and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023452126). A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL (1990-March 2026) identified studies reporting dosing strategies or PK of HAM in obese or overweight pediatric patients. Studies were included if they reported dosing recommendations or PK parameters. Eligible designs comprised prospective and retrospective, randomized and non-randomized, observational (cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional), case series, case reports, and narrative and systematic reviews. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers. Methodological quality was assessed using validated tools, and results were synthesized qualitatively. Results: Of 5801 records, 91 studies were included, providing evidence for only 27% of the evaluated HAM. Total body weight (TBW) appeared to be appropriate for insulin and vancomycin, although close monitoring was required. TBW-based dosing was associated with approximately 20% overexposure for enoxaparin, supporting the use of fat-free mass…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free