Evidence Hub

A case of glucocorticoid-induced diabetes in which the efficacy between sitagliptin and metformin was compared

Ishibashi C, Yasuda T, Matsuoka TA, Hirai K, Sakamoto F, Kitamura T, Kozawa J, Otsuki M et al.

Diabetology international, 2016

Abstract

To date, promising strategies for treating glucocorticoid (GC)-induced diabetes with antidiabetic drugs have not been established. We herein report the case of a woman with GC-induced diabetes in which we compared the efficacy of two kinds of orally administered antidiabetic drugs sitagliptin and metformin by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and meal-challenge test (MCT). As a result, CGM showed that daily fluctuation of blood glucose levels was reduced during administration of metformin but not during administration of sitagliptin. On the other hand, MCT showed that administration of metformin reduced plasma glucose levels accompanied by the decrease of plasma insulin levels and the increase of plasma glucagon levels, whereas administration of sitagliptin had little effects on these parameters. This case is the first report to compare the efficacy between sitagliptin and metformin in glucose homeostasis by CGM and MCT in a patient with GC-induced diabetes.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free