Evidence Hub

Correlates of use of antifracture therapy in older women with low bone mineral density

Ryder KM, Shorr RI, Tylavsky FA, Bush AJ, Bauer DC, Simonsick EM, Strotmeyer ES, Harris TB et al.

Journal of general internal medicine, 2006

1,584 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines exist for treatment of low bone mineral density (BMD). Little is known about patient characteristics associated with use of treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To determine patient-related correlates of medication use following screening dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of older adults.

DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study.

SETTING: Pittsburgh, PA and Memphis, TN.

PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling women between the ages 70 and 79 years enrolled in the Health, Aging, and Body Composition (Health ABC) Study.

MEASUREMENTS: Risk factors for fracture and BMD of the hip were assessed at baseline. Patients and their community physicians were supplied the results of the DXA scan. Prescription and over-the-counter medication use was collected at annual exams for 2 years.

RESULTS: Of 1,584 women enrolled in Health ABC, 378 had an indication for antifracture therapy and were not receiving such treatment at baseline. By the second annual follow-up examination, prescription antiresorptive medication was reported in 49 (13.0%), whereas 65 (17.2%) received calcium and/or vitamin D supplementation. In adjusted models, the strongest predictor for use of any antifracture medicine was presence of osteoporosis [vs osteopenia, odds ratio (OR), 2.9 (1.7 to 4.7)], white race [OR, 2.6 (1.5 to 4.8)], and receipt of the flu shot [OR, 2.2 (1.3 to 3.8)]. Neither a history of falls nor prior fracture was associated with use of antifracture medications.

CONCLUSION: Even when…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,584 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free