Evidence Hub

Tailored screening and eradication of Helicobacter pylori at a subnational level of China: multicenter observational studies in Ya'an city and a rapid meta-analysis in Sichuan province

Wang L, Chen O, Chen XZ, SIGES Research Group

Frontiers in public health, 2026

1,203 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori infection remains a major public health concern in China, with prevalence and antimicrobial resistance patterns varying significantly at the subnational level. A multicenter observational study performed in Ya’an city showed that the pooled average prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection was as high as 31.9% (19,058/59,791) during 2021–2023, despite significantly declining form 35.6% in 2021 to 30.4% in 2023 (P for trend < 0.0001). Moreover, men were more likely than woman to be infected in any year (p < 0.001) or any age group (p < 0.001), with the only exception being the 30–39 years age group. Additionally, the 60–69 years age group had highest prevalence among both males (38.7%) and females (33.5%), respectively. A sequential multicenter study in Ya’an (2023–2024) found high antimicrobial resistance to metronidazole (96.9%), levofloxacin (45.9%), and clarithromycin (30.2%), with 17.6% multi-drug resistance. A rapid meta-analysis on four recent studies in Sichuan province (1,203 patients) found the isolation rate of Helicobacter pylori was 70.7% (95% CI 55.8%–85.6%). The pooled estimate consistently confirmed those high resistance rates, although amoxicillin (0.4%), tetracycline (0.3%), and furazolidone (0%) maintained consistently extremely low resistance in Sichuan. Rifampicin resistance was quite diverse in Sichuan. These findings highlight the need for organized massive screening for Helicobacter pylori infection that should be encouraged in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,203 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free