Evidence Hub

Symptomatic fracture risk in the renal replacement therapy population

Dey V, Farrah TE, Traynor JP, Spalding EM, Robertson SE, Geddes CC

Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, 2017

2,096 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bone fractures are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT). The aim of this multicentre observational study was to quantify the incidence of radiologically proven bone fracture by anatomical site in prevalent RRT groups and study its relationship to potential risk factors.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of electronic records of all 2096 adults prevalent on RRT in the West of Scotland on 7 July 2010 across all hospitals (except one where inception was 1 August 2011) to identify all subsequent radiologically proven fractures during a median 3-year follow-up.

RESULTS: There were 340 fractures, with an incidence of 62.8 per 1000 patient-years. The incidences were 37.6, 99.2 and 57.6 per 1000 patient-years in the transplant, haemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) groups, respectively (P < 0.05). In the multivariable model, age and HD (relative to transplant or PD) were independently associated with increased risk of fractures, while primary glomerular disease, increasing serum albumin and taking alfacalcidol or lanthanum were associated with decreased risk. In a multivariable model of only HD patients, age was independently associated with an increased risk of fractures, while glomerular disease, high serum albumin and being on alfacalcidol and lanthanum were associated with decreased risk. In a multivariable model in transplant patients, there were no significant independent predictors of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 2,096 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free