Evidence Hub

The associations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, vitamin D binding protein gene polymorphisms, and race with risk of incident fracture-related hospitalization: Twenty-year follow-up in a bi-ethnic cohort (the ARIC Study)

Radhika Takiar, P. Lutsey, Di Zhao, E. Guallar, A. Schneider, M. Grams, L. Appel, E. Selvin et al.

Bone, 2015

23 citations

Abstract

Background Deficient levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] have been associated with increased fracture risk. Racial differences in fracture risk may be related to differences in bioavailable vitamin D due to single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variations in the Vitamin D Binding Protein (DBP). Methods We measured 25(OH)D levels in 12,781 middle-aged white and black participants [mean age 57 years (SD 5.7), 25% black] in the ARIC Study who attended the second examination from 1990–1992. Participants were genotyped for two DBP SNPs (rs4588 and rs7041). Incident hospitalized fractures were measured by abstracting hospital records for ICD-9 codes. We used Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the association between 25(OH)D levels and risk of fracture with adjustment for possible confounders. Interactions were tested by race and DBP genotype. Results There were 1,122 incident fracture-related hospitalizations including 267 hip fractures over a median of 19.6 years of follow-up. Participants with deficient 25(OH)D (<20 ng/ml) had a higher risk of any fracture hospitalization [HR=1.21 (95% CI 1.05–1.39)] and hospitalization for hip fracture [HR=1.35 (1.02–1.79)]. No significant racial interaction was noted (p-interaction=0.20 for any fracture; 0.74 for hip fracture). There was no independent association of rs4588 and rs7041 with fracture. However, there was a marginal interaction for 25(OH)D deficiency with rs7041 among whites (p-interaction=0.065). Whites with both…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free