Evidence Hub

Vitamin D receptor gene and risk of fracture in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis

H. Shen, J. Xie, H. Lu

Climacteric, 2014

27 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Fracture is the major clinical outcome of osteoporosis. The vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene is thought to be a candidate gene for osteoporosis. Many genetic studies have suggested an association of VDR polymorphisms and fracture risk, but evidence remains conflicting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the genetic effect of the BsmI, TaqI, ApaI and FokI polymorphisms in the VDR gene on fracture risk in postmenopausal women.

METHODS: Relevant studies were identified from the following electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science before September 2013. Statistical analysis was performed by using the software STATA 12.0. A total 1975 fracture cases and 4565 controls in 14 studies with a total of 16 eligible comparisons were identified for data analysis.

RESULTS: No evidence of relationship between the VDR BsmI, TaqI, ApaI or FokI polymorphisms and fracture risk was observed with any genetic model in postmenopausal women (BsmI: b vs. B: odds ratio (OR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90-1.29; TaqI: T vs. t: OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.68-1.15; ApaI: A vs. a: OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.76-1.08; FokI: F vs. f: OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.76-1.90).

CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that ApaI, BsmI, TaqI and FokI polymorphisms may be not associated with the risk of fracture in postmenopausal women. Further studies in a larger sample population are required to confirm this finding.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free