Evidence Hub

Long-term dietary vitamin D intake and risk of fracture and osteoporosis: a longitudinal cohort study of Swedish middle-aged and elderly women

Greta Snellman, L. Byberg, E. W. Lemming, H. Melhus, R. Gedeborg, H. Mallmin, A. Wolk, K. Michaëlsson

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2014

5,022 participants · 25 citations

Abstract

CONTEXT

The importance of dietary vitamin D for osteoporotic fracture prevention is uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to investigate associations between dietary vitamin D intake with risk of fracture and osteoporosis.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

In the population-based Swedish Mammography Cohort (including 61 433 women followed for 19 years), diet was assessed by repeated food frequency questionnaires.

SETTING

The study was conducted in 2 municipalities in central Sweden.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Incident fractures were identified from registry data. In a subcohort (n = 5022), bone mineral density was determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D was measured using HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

A total of 14 738 women experienced any type of first fracture during follow-up, and 3871 had a hip fracture. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for any first fracture was 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.01) for the lowest (mean, 3.1 μg/d) and 1.02 (0.96-1.07) for the highest (mean, 6.9 μg/d) quintile compared with the third quintile of vitamin D intake. The corresponding HR for a first hip fracture was 1.02 (0.96-1.08) for the lowest and 1.14 (1.03-1.26) for the highest quintile. Intakes >10 μg/d, compared with <5 μg/d, conferred an HR of 1.02 (0.92-1.13) for any fracture and an HR of 1.27 (1.03-1.57) for hip fracture. The intake of vitamin D did not affect the odds for osteoporosis, although higher levels were associated with higher…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 5,022 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free