Evidence Hub

Effectiveness of Personalized Nutrition Advice Delivered Via Dietary Consultations for Optimizing Dietary Calcium Intake in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and Monitored as Outpatients: a Randomized, Single-blind, Bicentric Study

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2020

182 participants

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to measure effectiveness at 6 months of personalized dietary advice versus dietary counseling via delivery of a standard advice sheet for optimizing dietary calcium intake (assessed by a food survey based on CIQUAL\* data) in MS patients with ambulatory monitoring.

\*CIQUAL Data: Table of nutritional food composition available on the ANSES (National Agency for Sanitary Security of Food, Environment and Labour) website, published by the Observatory of the Nutritional Quality of Foods. This table includes 1,500 sheets of 58 nutritional components. The data is integrated into the software for calculating ingesta (DATAMEAL) at the Nîmes University Hospital.

Conditions: Multiple Sclerosis.

Primary outcome: Calcium intake in mg per day; Calcium intake in mg per day.

Enrollment: 182 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 182 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free