Evidence Hub

Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and the risk of fractures in older women. For the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group

Kristine E. Ensrud, Katie L. Stone, Jane A. Cauley, Chris White, Joseph M. Zmuda, Tuan V. Nguyen, John A. Eisman, Steven Ron Cummings

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1999

223 participants · 73 citations

Abstract

The association between vitamin D receptor gene polypmorphisms and bone mineral density is controversial. The relationship between vitamin D receptor genotype and risk of fracture is uncertain. To determine whether vitamin D receptor polymorphisms were associated with the risk of hip, vertebral, and other (nonhip, nonvertebral) fractures in elderly women, we conducted a case-cohort study within a prospective study of 9704 community-dwelling women aged 65 years and older. Vitamin D receptor allele and genotype frequencies in women who experienced first incident hip (n = 181), vertebral (n = 127), and other (n = 223) fractures were compared with those of control women selected randomly from the cohort. Average length of follow-up was 6.5, 3.7, and 5.4 years for women in hip, vertebral, and other fracture analyses, respectively. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms were determined by polymerase chain reaction amplification of genomic DNA using TaqI and ApaI restriction site endonuclease digestion. All nonvertebral fractures were confirmed by X-ray reports; hip fractures were validated by review of X-ray films. Vertebral fractures were defined by morphometry using lateral spine radiography at baseline and an average of 3.7 years later. Allele or genotype frequencies did not differ between fracture cases and their respective controls. Vitamin D receptor genotype (defined by TaqI, ApaI, or the combination of TaqI and ApaI) was not significantly associated with the risk of hip,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 223 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free