Evidence Hub

Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms Are Associated with the Risk of Fractures in Postmenopausal Women, Independently of Bone Mineral Density

Patrick Garnero, Françoise Munoz, Olivier Borel, Elisabeth Sornay‐Rendu, Pierre Dominique Delmas

The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2005

589 participants · 87 citations

Abstract

CONTEXT: Osteoporosis is a systemic disease with a strong genetic component. Vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms explain only a small part of the genetic influence on the level of bone mineral density (BMD), whereas their effect on fracture remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the relationships between VDR genotypes and fracture risk. DESIGN: A prospective population-based cohort was studied. SUBJECTS: A total of 589 postmenopausal women (mean age, 62 yr) were followed prospectively during a median (interquartile) of 11 (1.1) yr. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The study measured incidents of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. RESULTS: VDR allele B was significantly and dose dependently overrepresented in women who fractured, including 34 and 86 women with first incident vertebral and nonvertebral fragility fractures, respectively. This corresponded to an odds ratio of 1.5 (95% confidence interval, 0.95-2.40) for heterozygous carriers (bB, n = 286) and 2.10 (95% confidence interval, 1.16-3.79) for homozygous carriers (BB, n = 90) of the B allele, compared with women with the bb genotype (n = 213). VDR genotype groups did not differ for demographics, physical activity, grip strength, personal and maternal history of fracture, and calcium intake. The association was independent of BMD of the spine, hip, and radius, and of the BMD loss at the radius. The relationship between VDR polymorphisms and fracture risk was not altered after…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 589 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free