Evidence Hub

COVID-19 and long-term risk of incident laboratory-defined micronutrient deficiency in patients with type 2 diabetes: a multicenter propensity score-matched cohort study

Chen IW, Chang LC, Hung KC

Frontiers in nutrition, 2026

645,168 participants

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 has been linked to broad post-acute sequelae, but delayed micronutrient deficiency remains insufficiently characterized. Whether COVID-19 increases long-term risks of laboratory-defined vitamin D, magnesium, and vitamin B12 deficiencies among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is unclear.

Methods: Using the predominantly US-based TriNetX network, we identified adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) during 2020-2022 who had COVID-19 and matched controls without COVID-19. A 12-month landmark design excluded pre-existing deficiencies, skeletal outcomes, and early deaths. After 1:1 propensity score matching, Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for incident deficiencies and skeletal outcomes over an up-to-5-year analytic window, with tested-cohort, severity-gradient, competing-risk, and E-value analyses.

Results: After matching, 645,168 patients remained per group. COVID-19 was associated with higher risks of vitamin D deficiency (HR, 1.79), magnesium deficiency (HR, 1.77), vitamin B12 deficiency (HR, 1.56), osteoporosis (HR, 1.55), osteoporotic fracture (HR, 1.73), femur fracture (HR, 1.58), and death (HR, 1.59; all p p < 0.001). In tested cohorts, cumulative-incidence estimates remained higher after COVID-19 despite greater competing mortality. Risks were generally higher after severe infection.

Conclusion: In patients with T2DM, COVID-19 was associated with increased long-term risks of laboratory-defined micronutrient deficiencies and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 645,168 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free