Evidence Hub

Stress Fracture Risk in Military Trainees Is Associated With Modifiable Lifestyle and Training Factors: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

Hseinat L, Al-Mwajeh AR, Shari N, Al Zoubi S, Al Qudah O, Ghnaimat M, Al Bakri M, Abu Hazim M et al.

Cureus, 2026

Abstract

Introduction/Objectives Stress fractures are a common and debilitating injury in military populations. Early identification of risk factors is critical for prevention. The purpose of this study was to identify demographic, clinical, lifestyle, and training-related factors associated with stress fractures in military trainees and to characterize their anatomical distribution. Methods A retrospective case-control study was conducted at King Hussein Medical City from January 2021 to June 2023, including 600 military trainees (139 with stress fractures and 461 controls). Data collected included age, gender, training duration, prior conditioning, smoking status, vitamin D and calcium levels, previous joint injuries, and footwear usage. Statistical analysis was used to determine factors significantly associated with stress fracture risk (p < 0.05). Fracture locations were descriptively analyzed. Results The fracture group was younger (21.78 ± 3.70 vs 24.50 ± 3.33 years) and presented earlier in training (12.1 ± 1.2 days vs. 30.4 ± 22.5 days). They had higher rates of military shoe usage (70.5% vs. 23%), smoking history (64.03% vs. 20.4%), and lower vitamin D levels (26.63 ± 16.56 vs. 42.97 ± 13.75 ng/mL) (all p < 0.001). The most common fracture site was the tibial plateau (43.2%), and 23.0% of cases involved multiple sites. Most fractures (80.6%) were high-grade (Fredericson Grade 3 or 4). Conclusion In this retrospective case-control study, stress fracture occurrence among…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free