Evidence Hub

Associations between dietary vitamin C and K intake and site-specific bone mineral density in Iranian adults: findings from the Iranian multicenter osteoporosis study (IMOS-2021)

Sehatpour F, bioky AA, Ghazbani A, Sajjadi-Jazi SM, Jalili A, Aghakhani A, Farsi F, Mansourzadeh MJ et al.

2026

1,368 participants

Abstract

Abstract Background Vitamins C and K are essential for bone matrix formation and mineralization, and their inadequate intake may contribute to site‑specific bone loss and osteoporosis; however, evidence from Middle Eastern populations remains limited. Objective This study aimed to investigate the association between dietary intake of vitamins C and K and the likelihood of osteoporosis at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck in Iranian adults. Methods This cross-sectional investigation drew on data from adults aged ≥ 50 years enrolled in the 2021 Iranian Multicenter Osteoporosis Study. Participants’ usual dietary intake was assessed using a validated 168-item food frequency questionnaire, and bone mineral density was quantified via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Association between vitamin C and K intake and site-specific osteoporosis were examined using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models; adjusted for age, gender, BMI, diabetes, kidney function, vitamin D status, and total energy intake. Complex survey design was considered by applying sampling weights in all analyses. Results Among 1,368 Iranian adults (607 men) with a mean age of 60.8 ± 8.0 years, the mean daily intake of vitamins C and K was 160.5 mg and 94.4 µg, respectively. The prevalence of insufficient intake was 21.9% for vitamin C and 63.5% for vitamin K based on sex-specific RDAs. Vitamin C and K insufficiency were both significantly more common among individuals with osteoporosis…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 1,368 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free