Evidence Hub

Case Report: Reopening the anabolic window - romosozumab added to ongoing denosumab for severe osteoporosis in two kidney transplant recipients

Barbuto S, Mastromauro P, Zavatta G, Vetrano D, Mistretta A, Bisceglia N, Comai G, Pagotto U et al.

Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026

Abstract

Kidney transplant recipients develop disorders of mineral and bone metabolism that further impair bone strength, leading to osteoporosis and a high fracture risk. However, evidence in this setting is limited. Romosozumab, a sclerostin inhibitor with both anabolic and antiresorptive effects, is an attractive option, but its use in transplant recipients, as well as its combination with denosumab, has rarely been reported. We describe two female kidney transplant recipients with severe osteoporosis and persistently high fracture risk despite long-term denosumab, in whom romosozumab (210 mg monthly) was added to ongoing denosumab for 12 months. In both patients the bone-formation markers P1NP and BAP rose early, and bone mineral density improved preferentially at the lumbar spine (Case 1 + 5.9%, Case 2 + 11.2%), with only modest changes at the femoral neck and total hip. Serum calcium, parathyroid hormone, 25-hydroxyvitamin D and allograft function remained stable throughout, with no clinically significant hypocalcemia, and neither patient sustained a new vertebral fracture. Adding romosozumab to ongoing denosumab thus reopened the anabolic window and improved lumbar-spine bone mineral density without compromising mineral metabolism or graft function. This combination may represent a reasonable option for carefully selected transplant recipients who continue to lose bone or to fracture despite antiresorptive therapy, pending confirmation in controlled studies.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free