Evidence Hub

10-Year Outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty for Fracture Compared to Osteoarthritis Indications

Garcia D, Michael BR, Glenn ER, Agarwal AR, Suresh SJ, Thakkar SC

The Journal of arthroplasty, 2026

1,062 participants

Abstract

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed after periarticular knee fracture is technically complex and has demonstrated higher complication rates within five years compared with osteoarthritis (OA)-indicated TKA. Comparative outcomes beyond five years in a large US cohort remain limited. We compared 10-year surgical outcomes after fracture-indicated versus OA-indicated primary TKA.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed using a large, nationally federated electronic health record database. Adults undergoing primary TKA were categorized as fracture-indicated (history of distal femoral or proximal tibia fracture with posttraumatic OA within five years prior to TKA, excluding primary OA) or OA-indicated (primary OA within five years, excluding prior knee fracture and posttraumatic OA). Exclusions included inflammatory arthritis, joint infection, pyogenic arthritis, and bone malignancy. Cohorts were propensity score-matched 1:1 for age, sex, race, ethnicity, Charlson comorbidity index, overweight and obesity, nicotine dependence, osteoporosis without a current pathological fracture, and vitamin D deficiency. The primary 10-year outcomes were all-cause revision, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture, and secondary fragility fracture. After matching, 1,062 patients remained in each cohort.

Results: At 10 years, fracture-indicated TKA demonstrated a higher risk of revision (5.8 versus 3.0%, P = 0.002; risk ratio =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,062 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free