Evidence Hub

Calcium, vitamin D, or combined supplementation to prevent fractures and falls: systematic review and meta-analysis

Massé O, Mercurio CM, Dupuis S, Al Sahwi M, Arruda A, Dallaire G, Desforges K, Dugré N et al.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2026

9,067 participants · 13 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objective To assess the effect of calcium, vitamin D, or combined supplementation on fractures and falls in adults. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources Trials included in systematic reviews from 2014, three databases (Medline, Embase, CENTRAL) to 19 February 2025, clinical trial registries, abstracts from scientific meetings, and references from included studies. Eligibility criteria Randomised controlled trials comparing calcium, vitamin D, or combined supplementation with placebo or no treatment in adults (≥18 years) not receiving drug treatment for osteoporosis. Data extraction and synthesis The primary outcome was the risk of any fracture. Secondary outcomes included the risk of hip fracture, non-vertebral fracture, vertebral fracture, and falling, as well as the total number of falls. Pairs of reviewers independently screened trials, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the second version of Cochrane’s risk of bias tool. Findings were synthesised using random effects meta-analyses and appraised using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation, with application of thresholds for absolute effects considered important. Results This review included 69 trials involving 153 902 participants. Participants in most of the trials were community dwelling (87%) and not at high risk of fractures or falls (73%). For the primary outcome of any fracture, little to no effect was found from use of calcium supplements (11…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 9,067 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free