From Jones to avulsion: rethinking the fifth metatarsal base
Abstract
Purpose of review: Fifth metatarsal fractures are the most common metatarsal injury in the pediatric population; however, their management is frequently extrapolated from adult protocols. This review explores the emergence of pediatric-specific classification systems and evolving evidence on surgical versus conservative treatment in skeletally immature patients.
Recent findings: Anatomical and developmental differences critically distinguish pediatric fractures from adult fractures. Recent pediatric classifications, including those by Herrera-Soto and Lee, improve upon the widely used Dameron/Lawrence-Botte system by recognizing the apophysis as a distinct entity and offering better prognostic correlation. Zone 1 avulsion fractures achieve near-universal healing with conservative management. Emerging evidence supports surgical fixation with intramedullary screws for Zone 2 (Jones) fractures in adolescent athletes, whereas prepubertal patients respond well to conservative treatment. Nutritional factors, particularly vitamin D deficiency and inadequate calcium intake, are increasingly being recognized as modifiable risk factors for stress fractures and delayed union.
Summary: The management of fifth metatarsal fractures should be individualized according to the fracture zone, skeletal maturity, and activity level. Pediatric-specific classifications offer improved diagnostic accuracy. Nutritional optimization should be integrated into comprehensive management protocols, and…
Read the paper
Related studies
- Effectiveness of Bisphosphonates and Denosumab on Risk of Vertebral Fractures in Prostate Cancer Patients Under Androgen Deprivation Therapies: A Real-World Prospective Study
- Osteoporosis-related fractures after spinal cord injury: a retrospective study from Brazil
- Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, parathyroid hormone, and mortality in older men
- Lack of Association between Vitamin D Insufficiency and Cardiovascular or Fracture Risk: A UK Biobank Study
- Muscle strength and body composition are clinical indicators of osteoporosis
- Incidence of bone protection and associated fragility injuries in patients with proximal femur fractures
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.