Evidence Hub

Long-term intranasal corticosteroids vs. antihistamines and bone health in post-menopausal women with allergic rhinitis: a retrospective cohort study

Jia X, Liu L, Yang Y

Frontiers in medicine, 2026

198 participants

Abstract

Background: Intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) are first-line therapy for allergic rhinitis (AR), but their long-term skeletal safety in post-menopausal women-who are inherently vulnerable to bone loss-remains inadequately studied despite low systemic bioavailability.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 691 post-menopausal women with persistent AR treated from 2015 to 2023. Participants were categorized into INCS (n = 198), second-generation antihistamine (sgAH, n = 187), combination therapy (n = 156), and control (n = 150) groups. Primary outcomes were changes in bone mineral density (BMD) T-scores and incident osteoporosis. Secondary outcomes included fragility fractures. Multivariable regression analyses were performed with adjustment for confounders, and dose-response relationships were evaluated using defined daily doses.

Results: Over a median follow-up of 4.2 years, INCS users exhibited significantly greater declines in lumbar spine T-scores compared to controls, with similar findings at the femoral neck. sgAH users showed no significant bone loss. Dose-response analysis revealed linear trends for greater bone loss with higher cumulative INCS exposure. Incident osteoporosis occurred in 24.2% of INCS users vs. 11.3% of controls. Fragility fracture rates were highest in the INCS group with adjusted HR 3.85 (95% CI = 1.45-10.24, p = 0.007) vs. controls. sgAH showed no increased fracture risk (HR 1.13, 95% CI = 0.33-3.89). Subgroup analyses identified…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 198 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free