Evidence Hub

Three-year longitudinal assessment of denosumab's efficacy and safety in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a 36-month real-world cohort study

Xia RL, Li C, Wang L, Chao AJ, Wei W

Frontiers in medicine, 2026

130 participants

Abstract

Background: Denosumab is an effective antiresorptive therapy for postmenopausal osteoporosis; however, long-term real-world data regarding sustained efficacy, treatment adherence, safety, and biochemical outcomes remain limited. This study evaluated the 36-month effectiveness and safety of denosumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis receiving routine clinical care.

Methods: This retrospective analysis included a prospectively followed real-world clinical cohort of 130 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with denosumab (60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months) plus calcium and vitamin D supplementation. Participants were followed for 36 months with assessments at baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months. Outcomes included bone mineral density (BMD), T-scores, bone turnover markers, renal function, adherence patterns, prior treatment history, fracture occurrence, and adverse events. Changes over time were analyzed using paired longitudinal comparisons and linear mixed-effects models, with significance defined as p < 0.05.

Results: Lumbar spine (L1-L4) BMD increased from 0.674 ± 0.120 to 0.741 ± 0.102 g/cm2, while femoral neck BMD increased from 0.526 ± 0.086 to 0.562 ± 0.079 g/cm2 over 36 months (both p β-CTX and PINP, indicating sustained suppression of bone resorption. No clinically meaningful renal deterioration was observed during follow-up. Twenty-one participants had prior osteoporosis treatment history, whereas all included patients completed seven denosumab…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 130 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free