Evidence Hub

Teriparatide treatment of osteoporosis in solid organ transplant recipients-a single-center experience

Diker Cohen T, Shraga-Slutzky I, Kaminer K, Gorshtein A, Dotan I, Tsvetov G

Archives of osteoporosis, 2026

20 participants

Abstract

Solid organ transplant recipients face high fracture risk with limited evidence guiding anabolic therapy. In this real-world cohort, teriparatide was associated with significant improvements in bone mineral density and acceptable safety without adverse graft effects. These findings support selective anabolic treatment in high-risk transplant recipients and highlight the need for prospective studies.

Purpose: Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at high risk for osteoporosis and fragility fractures due to pre-existing organ dysfunction and long-term immunosuppressive therapy, particularly glucocorticoids. However, evidence supporting the use of anabolic osteoporosis therapy in this population remains limited.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a large transplant center including adult kidney, lung, and liver transplant recipients selected for teriparatide treatment based on clinical indications for severe post-transplant osteoporosis for at least 3 months. Bone mineral density (BMD), incident fractures, biochemical parameters, renal function, and adverse events were evaluated during treatment and follow-up.

Results: Thirty-nine SOT recipients (33% men; mean age 61.3 ± 11.6 years) were included, comprising kidney (n = 10), lung (n = 20), and liver (n = 9) transplant recipients. Prior fragility fractures were present in 90% of patients, and 79% had multiple fractures. Median teriparatide treatment duration was 22.3 months. Significant increases in BMD…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 20 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free