Evidence Hub

Changes in bone metabolism and densitometry after metabolic/bariatric surgery: a comparison of pre- and postoperative results in a prospective long-term study

Felsenreich DM, Vock N, Pedarnig L, Fiedler B, Nöbauer-Huhmann IM, Jedamzik J, Gensthaler L, Nixdorf L et al.

Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery, 2026

60 participants

Abstract

Background: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is associated with sustained weight loss and metabolic improvement. However, the understanding of its long-term effects on skeletal health remains incomplete, particularly with respect to different surgical procedures.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate long-term changes in bone metabolism, bone mineral density (BMD), and fracture risk after sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB).

Setting: University hospital.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort with prospective long-term follow-up, 60 patients (20 RYGB, 20 OAGB, and 20 SG) underwent primary MBS. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-derived bone densitometry and bone metabolism markers were assessed preoperatively and after a mean follow-up of 10.1± 2.5 years. Measurements included BMD, T-score, and z score at lumbar spine and femoral neck. Ten-year fracture probability was estimated using the FRAX (Fracture Risk Assessment tool) score.

Results: Bone metabolism markers largely remained within reference ranges throughout follow-up. Serum vitamin D levels increased significantly after all procedures reflecting postoperative supplementation. In contrast, significant reductions in femoral BMD was observed after all three procedures (SG: .99 ± .14 to .49 ± .17 g/cm2, P = .03; RYGB: 1.09 ± .80 to .59 ± .17 g/cm2, P = .02; OAGB: 1.11 ± .18 to .53 ± .13 g/cm2, P = .01), whereas lumbar spine BMD showed no significant…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 60 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free