Evidence Hub

Chronobiology of fracture repair: local molecular clocks, rhythm protection, and time-anchored translation

Lu W, Jiang N, Zhang J, Wang J, Wu Z, Jin J

Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026

Abstract

Fracture repair is a prototypic regenerative process in adult tissues and proceeds through a temporally organised sequence of haematoma formation and inflammation, cartilaginous callus formation, hard callus mineralisation, and callus remodelling. Conventional fracture research has primarily attributed variation in healing outcomes to mechanical stability, vascular supply, inflammation, metabolic bone status, drug exposure, nutrition, and rehabilitation loading. Time, by contrast, has often been treated as a background variable. Emerging evidence from circadian biology and molecular-clock research indicates that bone turnover markers, endocrine signals, immune responses, vascular function, sleep-wake organisation, and the activities of osteoblasts, osteoclasts, chondrocytes, macrophages, and endothelial cells are subject to rhythmic regulation. In particular, Per2::Luc oscillation at the mouse femur fracture site and its responsiveness to parathyroid hormone (PTH) provide direct preclinical evidence that a local molecular clock can operate within the fracture repair niche. Fracture chronobiology, however, remains at an early translational stage. Current evidence is derived largely from animal models, cell studies, human bone-marker physiology, sleep and circadian-disruption experiments, and perioperative literature. Direct time-resolved clinical data in human fracture repair remain sparse. Accordingly, the available evidence does not justify recommending a specific clock…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free