Evidence Hub

Risk stratification improves outcomes in an osteoporosis fracture liaison service

Kumar S, Nairn L, Bowman A, Dwyer S, Wijewardene A, Davidoff DF, Gild ML, Girgis CM et al.

Archives of osteoporosis, 2026

1,903 participants

Abstract

Selecting patients at higher baseline risk of fragility fracture may optimise clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of hospital fracture liaison services (FLS). In this cohort study, we found a risk-stratified approach led to a higher rate of treatment initiation and estimated number of fractures prevented compared to the traditional FLS strategy.

Purpose: Hospital-based fracture liaison services (FLS) are cost-effective and reduce refracture risk. However, optimal FLS characteristics to maximise clinical and cost-effectiveness are uncertain.

Methods: We reviewed data for FLS patients at Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney (2015-2023). In 2018, the patient selection strategy was adjusted from a traditional approach (any fragility fracture, ≥ 50 years) to preferentially invite those either ≥ 60 years with any fragility fracture, or any presenting with hip and/or vertebral fractures. Cohorts entering the service pre-(FLS1) and post-this timepoint (FLS2) were compared regarding clinical characteristics, estimated fracture risk and pharmacotherapy initiation. Modelling was performed to estimate fractures averted.

Results: The total cohort (n = 1903) was median 68-years-old and predominantly female (77%). Both cohorts were similar in sex distribution and prevalence of various fracture risk factors. The FLS2 cohort was older (median 69 vs 65 years, p < 0.001), more frequently presented with hip/vertebral fracture (21.4% vs 13.8%, p < 0.001), had higher Garvan-estimated 10-year…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,903 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free