Evidence Hub

Comparative Effectiveness of Therapeutic Interventions in Pregnancy and Lactation-Associated Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Anagnostis P, Lampropoulou-Adamidou K, Bosdou JK, Trovas G, Galanis P, Chronopoulos E, Goulis DG, Tournis S

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2024

451 participants

Abstract

CONTEXT: The optimal management of pregnancy and lactation-associated osteoporosis (PLO) has not been designated.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the best available evidence regarding the effect of different therapeutic interventions on bone mineral density (BMD) and risk of fractures in these patients.

METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed/Scopus databases until December 20, 2022. Data were expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% CI. The I2 index was employed for heterogeneity. Studies conducted in women with PLO who received any antiosteoporosis therapy were included. Studies including women with secondary causes of osteoporosis or with transient osteoporosis of the hip were excluded. Data extraction was independently completed by 2 researchers.

RESULTS: Sixty-six studies were included in the qualitative analysis (n = 451 [follow-up time range 6-264 months; age range 19-42 years]). The increase in lumbar spine (LS) BMD with calcium/vitamin D (CaD), bisphosphonates, and teriparatide was 2.0% to 7.5%, 5.0% to 41.5%, and 8.0% to 24.4% at 12 months, and 11.0% to 12.2%, 10.2% to 171.9%, and 24.1% to 32.9% at 24 months, respectively. Femoral neck (FN) BMD increased by 6.1% with CaD, and by 0.7% to 18% and 8.4% to 18.6% with bisphosphonates and teriparatide (18-24 months), respectively. Meta-analysis was performed for 2 interventional studies only. Teriparatide induced a greater increase in LS and FN BMD than CaD (WMD 11.5%, 95% CI 4.9-18.0%, I2…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 451 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free