Evidence Hub

The effect of cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) on the risk of fall and fracture: a meta-analysis

Jackson C, Gaugris S, Sen SS, Hosking D

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians, 2007

155 citations

Abstract

We evaluated the effect of supplementation with vitamin D(3) (excluding the potential effect of calcium supplementation) on the risk of fall and fracture, primarily in postmenopausal women, using a systematic literature review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for the period January 1985 to June 2005. Studies examining the effect of vitamin D versus placebo on the risk of fall or fracture in postmenopausal females were of particular interest. Studies of vitamin D in combination with calcium were also included where the control group was treated with calcium alone. Studies of men and women where results for men and women were not presented separately were included. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Our primary meta-analyses examined the effect of vitamin D(3) on the risk of fall or fracture; additional analyses examined baseline and difference between baseline and final levels of several serum and urinary biochemical markers. The pooled relative risk (RR) for vitamin D(3) preventing falls was 0.88 (95%CI 0.78-1.00). For fractures, the pooled RR for vitamin D(3) preventing non-vertebral fractures was 0.96 (95%CI 0.84-1.09) and the pooled RR for vitamin D(3) preventing vertebral fractures was 1.22 (95%CI 0.64-2.31). In a subgroup analysis of post-menopausal women, the pooled RR for vitamin D(3) preventing falls was 0.92 (95%CI 0.75-1.12) and in preventing non-vertebral fractures the pooled RR was 0.81 (95%CI 0.48-1.34). There is a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free