Evidence Hub

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the global prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistant Morganella morganii clinical isolates

Tasanapak K, Sitthisak S, Kitti T, Mahikul W, Kucharoenphaibul S, Wongwigkarn J, Leerach N

Scientific reports, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Morganella morganii is an opportunistic pathogen that infects a variety of tissues. The increasing resistance of M. morganii to fluoroquinolones is a global public health concern. Hence, in this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to determine the prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in M. morganii clinical isolates. We conducted a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases up to July 10, 2024, to identify studies on fluoroquinolone resistance in M. morganii. Studies that encompassed clinical isolates with fluoroquinolone susceptibility data were included. The prevalence of resistance was determined using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. Subgroup analyses were performed based on geographic region, study period, antibiotic susceptibility testing method, sample size, and study quality. Publication bias was evaluated using Begg's funnel plots and Egger's test. A total of 54 studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 45,440 clinical isolates. The pooled global prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in M. morganii was 21% (95% CI [16, 27]), with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 99.48%, p < 0.01). The resistance rate varied by region, with the highest rates observed in West Asia (62%) and Africa (55%) and the lowest in Australia (4%). The resistance rate also differed according to the type of fluoroquinolone, with the highest resistance recorded against the earlier-generation…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free