Evidence Hub

Vitamin D and the Risk of Stress Fractures in Athletes and Military Personnel: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Moraes BF, Leitão CVFS, Rodrigues VMS, Dressler HB, Paixão JC, da Silva ABN, de Oliveira GM, Medina G et al.

The American journal of sports medicine, 2026

4,183 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stress fractures are common overuse injuries in military personnel and athletes. Although a low vitamin D level is a proposed risk factor, the evidence is conflicting, and the specific risk in athletes has not been systematically synthesized.

PURPOSE: To assess the association between vitamin D status and the risk of stress fractures in military personnel and athletes.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS: Major databases were systematically searched through April 16, 2025 for studies that quantitatively measured serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in military or athlete populations with a stress fracture group and a control group. Data were pooled using a random-effects model to calculate the mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup analyses were conducted based on population type (military vs athlete), sex, and vitamin D status. Meta-regression was also performed to investigate sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS: A total of 15 studies (4183 participants) were included. Overall, patients with stress fractures had significantly lower vitamin D levels compared to controls (MD, -5.82 nmol/L [95% CI, -10.35 to -1.29]). The association was also significant for military personnel (MD, -7.33 nmol/L [95% CI, -11.77 to -2.89]) and male participants (MD, -9.14 nmol/L [95% CI, -14.23 to -4.06]). Subgroup analyses of female participants and athletes did not detect a statistically significant difference in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 4,183 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free