Evidence Hub

Factors influencing abnormal bone mineral density in Chinese women aged 40 years and older: A meta-analysis

Jia M, Chen T, Zhang S, Wang Y, Wang Y, Chang Y, Zhang G

Women & health, 2026

36,984 participants

Abstract

Abnormal bone mineral density (BMD), including osteopenia/low bone mass and osteoporosis, imposes a substantial clinical and socioeconomic burden on Chinese women. However, prevalence estimates vary markedly because primary studies differ in age composition, study setting, and the BMD outcome category reported. To systematically review and meta-analyze the prevalence of distinct BMD outcomes and the influencing factors associated with abnormal BMD among Chinese women aged 40 years and older. We searched nine international and Chinese databases from inception to July 10, 2025, for cross-sectional or case-control studies involving Chinese women aged 40 years or older. Prevalence was synthesized separately for abnormal BMD, osteopenia/low bone mass, and osteoporosis. Twenty-eight studies comprising 36,984 participants were included. Outcome-specific meta-analyses showed a pooled prevalence of 61 percent for abnormal BMD (95 percent CI: 50 percent-72 percent; n = 17,294), 41 percent for osteopenia/low bone mass (95 percent CI: 37 percent-46 percent; n = 19,032), and 29 percent for osteoporosis (95 percent CI: 23 percent-35 percent; n = 35,082). Heterogeneity remained substantial (I2 = 99.5 percent, 97.1 percent, and 99.1 percent). Postmenopausal status, menopause duration > 5 years, older age, BMI 2, lack of exercise, low vitamin D intake, and fracture history were associated with higher odds of abnormal BMD, whereas regular exercise, dairy products, bean products, and calcium…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 36,984 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free