Evidence Hub

Vitamin D Status and Supplementation in Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes

Kapetanakis S, Patrianakos M, Chatzivasiliadis M, Konstantinou P, Kostretzis L, Ditsios K

Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions, 2026

3,081 participants

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the association between vitamin D status or vitamin D-related interventions and outcomes following lumbar spinal fusion. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to January 2026 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies including adult patients undergoing lumbar fusion with assessment of vitamin D status or supplementation and a comparator group were eligible. Random-effects models were used as the primary analyses. Nine studies were included. Five studies (n = 351) assessed radiographic fusion success, demonstrating a significantly higher likelihood of fusion in patients with better vitamin D status or supplementation (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.13-1.38; I2 = 0%). Six studies (n = 3,081) evaluated fusion failure, showing a significantly lower risk in vitamin D-exposed groups (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.27-0.76; I2 = 34.8%). Sensitivity analyses indicated that heterogeneity was partly related to differences in outcome definitions and study design. Patient-reported outcomes showed inconsistent results, with no significant effects in random-effects analyses and changes below minimal clinically important differences. Vitamin D exposure was associated with improved radiographic outcomes; however, findings should be interpreted cautiously due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity. Further prospective studies are required.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,081 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free