Evidence Hub

Graves' disease and bone mineral density: a meta-analysis and UK Biobank

Wu M, Wang J, Lu Y, Yuan M, Ji J, Liang J, Cui J, Wang H et al.

Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026

42,374 participants

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the association between Graves' disease (GD) and bone mineral density by integrating a meta-analysis with a large-scale cross-sectional analysis in the UK Biobank.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for cohort and cross-sectional studies. The pooled findings were then examined in the UK Biobank using multivariable linear regression models with adjustment for age, BMI, lifestyle factors, vitamin D, calcium, and sex.

Results: The meta-analysis (14 studies, 3,643 participants) showed that GD patients had significantly lower bone mineral density than controls (Mean Difference = -0.09, 95% CI [-0.10, -0.07], P P = 0.023). However, substantial between-study heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 92.1%), indicating considerable variation across studies. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses identified postmenopausal women, older age (>50 years), and lower BMI as key factors amplifying the association. In the UK Biobank (n = 42374), after rigorous adjustment for all covariates, the association was substantially attenuated and remained statistically significant only at the ribs (P < 0.05), while other skeletal sites, including the lumbar spine and femoral neck, showed no significant differences.

Conclusion: This dual-evidence approach provides suggestive, rather than definitive, evidence that GD is associated with reduced BMD. The meta-analysis suggested widespread BMD reductions in GD patients. However, due to the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 42,374 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free