Evidence Hub

The effects of combined calcium and vitamin D supplementation on bone mineral density and fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Cong B, Zhang H

BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025

43,869 participants · 10 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the efficacy of combined calcium and vitamin D supplementation on bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search across multiple medical databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, collecting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from database inception to present. Data extraction and analysis were performed to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs) or risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), which were then presented in forest plots. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs with 43,869 participants were included. Combined supplementation modestly improved BMD at the pelvis (SMD = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05–0.35, p = 0.01) without significant changes in BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, or total hip. The overall fracture risk was not significantly reduced (RR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.89–1.07, p = 0.68). Subgroup analyses revealed improvements in serum 25‑hydroxyvitamin D levels (25OHD), especially in participants with baseline deficiencies (Z = 10.48, p 42 000 participants) yielded a neutral effect on any clinical fracture (pooled RR = 0.95; 95% CI 0.85–1.07; Z = 1.08, P = 0.28; I² = 0%). Sensitivity analyses affirmed the findings’ stability, with no evident publication bias. CONCLUSION: Combined calcium and vitamin D supplementation may improve pelvic BMD and correct serum 25OHD deficiencies in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 43,869 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free