Evidence Hub

Effects of Prunes on Bone Density in Humans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Treister-Goltzman Y, Peleg R

Nutrients, 2026

747 participants

Abstract

Background: Recent studies suggest that prunes are one of the most effective fruits for preventing and reversing bone loss. Objectives: The purpose of the present systematic review was to summarize the evidence from the randomized controlled studies on the effect of prunes on bone health in humans and to pool the results in a meta-analysis. The hypothesis of the present review was that bone mineral density of the pulled intervention group would be higher than that of the control group. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled studies with a three-level mixed-effects meta-analysis. Results: Of two hundred and eighty-four studies that were initially identified in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science using the search words, eleven papers (747 participants) were considered eligible. The effect of prune intervention in postmenopausal women was borderline significant at the lumbar spine, with BMD slightly higher in the intervention group (SMD [95% CI] = 1.30 [-0.03, 2.63]; I2 = 98%; p Conclusions: Our meta-analysis provides preliminary evidence of modest skeletal benefits associated with consumption of 50-100 g of prunes, particularly at the lumbar spine, a trabecular-rich site. However, the overall body of research remains limited.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 747 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free