Evidence Hub

Airborne contaminant exposure and bone development: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Vera-Colón MKM, Meletz RM, Phillipson CN, Sparks NRL

Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2026

Abstract

Air pollution, including particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5) and airborne metals (Cd, Hg, As, Pb) are a systemic health hazard, but osteotoxic effects remain underrecognized. We systematically synthesized human, animal, and in vitro evidence on airborne contaminants and outcomes to skeletal health. Following Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT) guidance, we searched PubMed and Google Scholar (2014-2024; final search November 24, 2024) for English-language studies relating PM or airborne metals to skeletal outcomes, excluding studies limited to adult occupational exposures, age-related bone disease, or non-peer-reviewed reports. Studies were screened and data extracted in Covidence. Risk of bias was assessed using tools from the Quality Assessment and Risk of Bias Tool Repository, and certainty of evidence was graded with GRADE. We used a random-effects meta-analyses model to estimate relative risks (RRs) interpreted as directional consistency hazards for bone loss, impaired osteoblast differentiation, enhanced osteoclast activity, bone marrow adiposity, epigenetic changes, and altered bone microarchitecture. Fifty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. Across outcomes, meta-analyses showed higher hazard risk in exposed versus control groups, with RRs ranging from 7 to 10; for example, bone loss (RR 7.12, 95% CI 4.20-12.06) and altered bone microarchitecture (RR 10.28, 95% CI 4.67-22.61). Epidemiologic and experimental evidence may implicate oxidative stress,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free